No, this won’t be a rant about how sacrilege it is to dare to remake Point Break (really?), or any other mediocre film that didn’t make much money at the box office but gained a (smaller than you want to believe) following from the DVD bargain bin or a million showings a month on cable. Nor is it a rant meant to whine about the seemingly large amount of remakes, reboots, sequels, prequels, spinoffs, or whatever other buzzword we’ve thrown at these franchise films lately. If anything, it’s a rant about the whining that goes on in the comments section of any and every story about remakes that makes the rounds on sites just like this one.
The constant response of “Hollywood is out of ideas!” irritates me to no end. It could be that Hollywood is simply out of options on what they will throw money at to produce and market in the hopes it will break even. Hollywood’s writers are not out of ideas. But just having an idea is not enough on its own for a studio to sink millions into developing, producing, and marketing a product that may be a complete failure and lose their business (don’t forget it’s a business) a whole lotta cash and may cause some people to lose their jobs for thinking that bomb was a good idea to spend that cash on.
My problem with the message board whining is that it implies the ONLY thing coming from major studios, as well as all the smaller indie houses, are these remakes and sequels. So many movies are made every year, that it’s virtually impossible to even ballpark how many there are. How many movies did you see last year? How many movies did you buy on disc or digitally? How many did you pay to stream or rent? Chances are if you combined all of those purchases you made on movies in a year, and multiplied that number by 100, you might have spent a few dollars on 1% of the movies that were made in that time span.
As an example, Disney released 12 movies last year, including all direct to video and theatrical releases as well as productions that premiered on the Disney Channel. Some of them were costly, some of them were not. Let’s say they averaged a $20 million dollar budget JUST for production (ignoring development and marketing costs). That’s a quarter of a billion dollars to produce their dozen features. Sounds like a lot of money to risk on the hope you might break even at the box office and maybe turn a profit on video/streaming. Except it’s a very conservative number I used. The combined reported production budgets of Big Hero Six, Into the Woods, Maleficent, and Muppets: Most Wanted was actually $445 million dollars. Remember also that to get people like Johnny Depp, Meryl Streep, and Angelina Jolie to be in these movies, they usually have to pass a percentage of any profits to them for years to come. Sounds like a very dicey proposition for someone responsible for the profits of their company and the jobs of people in that company.
So why the remakes? Because people go to see what they feel they will like. Characters and properties they already know they like is often an easy choice to make. It costs me $50 to take my family to the movies with 2 adults and 2 children. That’s a lot to ask of a working family to take a chance on something like John Carter. When you see a remake of a horror film, how often is it that you’ve ever even heard of any of the actors in that movie? Not very often, and never if you’re only a casual fan. Take the aforementioned Point Break remake. The only names I know in that cast are Ray Winstone and Delroy Lindo, and I only know them because I’m a huge character-actor geek. Unknown actors, and a small budget hoping to cash in on the brand recognition helps fuel profits. When they do hit the jackpot with The Avengers, that money is often the reason a dozen smaller, riskier, and ORIGINAL ideas get produced.
The hipster whining about the remake of Point Break, or Lori Petty’s whining for that matter, is missing the upside. Instead of pretending that Point Break is somehow untouchable (again, really?), just skip it and see something original. While you’re doing that, hope that Point Break makes money so that the profits can be used to fund something original and amazing.
Without the profits on remakes and big-time tent-pole flicks, we might not get to see things like Birdman, Whiplash, The Artist, Her, Gravity, The Grand Budapest Hotel, Django Unchained, The King’s Speech, Beasts of the Southern Wild, Winter’s Bone, The Kids are Alright, or any number of excellent films that weren’t remakes, reboots, sequels, prequels, spinoffs, ripoffs, etc.
Whining on Entertainment Weekly’s message board does nothing but irritate. Spend some money on those original ideas, if not at a theater, then elsewhere. Anywhere that will help those who funded it see that it was worth the cost. The original ideas are out there, you just need to look beyond what gets advertised on your TV Thursday nights ahead of a Friday release. Just make sure you don’t dismiss the excitement over big franchises. It is possible to enjoy both! I know do.